User talk:Beno Marija/My sandbox2008 Feedback

From Bioblast
< User talk:Beno Marija
Revision as of 15:03, 2 December 2016 by Beno Marija (talk | contribs) (Created page with "==MiPschool 2008 - Feedback== ::::Notes from roundtable feedback session in Schroecken (July 17, 2008; compiled by Patrick Subarsky and Francesca Scandurra). ::::Further feedba...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision β†’ (diff)

MiPschool 2008 - Feedback

Notes from roundtable feedback session in Schroecken (July 17, 2008; compiled by Patrick Subarsky and Francesca Scandurra).
Further feedback by Email from participants is welcome.
  • Lecture Organization
  • Topics of Interest
  • Special Interest Groups - Focussed Sessions
  • Poster Sessions
  • Information Resources
  • General Organization
  • General Comments



Lecture Organization

-separation of abilities (need introduction to field)
-real introduction to basics for young students
-need basic introduction
-first two days to get the basics
-more background before presentations
-responses did not flow during the lecture
-some presentations difficult to understand
-terminology difficult
-lecture on coupling and membrane potential was very good
-included beginner and expert
-enjoyed Vilma’s style of presentation
-lecture of C. Hoppel was very good
-more questions


Topics of Interest

-don’t have oxygraph, therefore am unfamiliar with method
-mitochondrial targetting
-ROS
-advantages to different preparations of biological samples
-data analysis
-more basic info on mitochondria
-genetic information of mitochondria
-mitochondrial transport mechanisms
-standard protocols/methodologies lecture
-buffers for respiration (what, why)
-introduction to subject of lectures
-mitochondrial diseases
-more basic information, methodological introduction
-protocols (why use specific method or reagent)
-basic methodology
-buffers
-membrane potential
-protocols on the web
-hand-outs/accessible to students


Special Interest Groups - Focussed Sessions

-appreciate more special interest groups
-parallel focus groups with multiple times
-Special Interest Groups early, then more at end to cover new topics/flexibility in program development
-break-up into smaller groups (8-10 people)
-divide the body for special interest groups (heart, muscle, brain)


Poster Sessions

-poster sessions a very good idea
-large circulating poster session
-student presentation very good, maybe extend
-stressed with flash presentation but good experience
-interactive abstracts-links to articles


Information Resources

-prescribe reading
-isolation is good (no internet)
-interaction experience/contact is important for idea exchange
-bring reprints, .pdf files
-small library of basic textbooks
-internet access and printers for information access
-use MiP Society for web access


General Organization

-keep all participants together for basic reviews at the beginning of lectures
-open atmosphere is good for learning
-good atmosphere, excellent interactions
-more questions/interaction –need to ask questions
-felt separation from O2k course to Summer School
-keep flexibility in schedule
-expected a lot from the course
-overlap to course/school is poor
-small groups for better interaction
-good to know level of attendees during registration
-can’t have comprehensive course, but mayb split a bit
-perfect to have long sessions


General Comments

-everything was perfect
-did not expect so much
-informal atmosphere is good
-MiP Summer was very good
-thanks to all presenters
-pleasure to be here/open/fantastic tutors
-enjoyed atmosphere/contact with people
-relaxed atmosphere is good to foster confidence
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.