Difference between revisions of "Talk:MitoGlobal Societies"
From Bioblast
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Comments on IMU== | ==Comments on IMU== | ||
* ''' | * '''MiP''board'' Meeting at [[MiP2011]]''' (2011-09-07) There was little time to discuss the [[IMU|International Mitochondrial Union]] in detail. The name of the 'mitochondrial union' should be short and concise. The consensus was to persue the idea of an international union, which will be encouraged by the [http://www.mitophysiology.org Mitochondrial Physiology Society]. | ||
[[ | [[Gnaiger E|Erich Gnaiger, Chairman, MiPsociety]] - [email protected] | ||
* '''Yau-Huei Wei''' (2011-09-04) Dear Dr. Gnaiger, It's great to meet with you again in Kagoshima, Japan during the Congress last week. I enjoyed very much the scientific activities as well as the social programs of the Congress. The proposal to establish an International Union of Mitochondrial Research and Medicine (IUMRM) is a great idea. My colleagues in Taiwan will fully support this organization. You may want to make an official proposal for each of the member societies to deliberate in their own council meetings. We can have an official establishment of the IUMRM and hold the First IUMRM Congress in Kyoto in 2013. | |||
[[Wei Y-H|Yau-Huei Wei]] - joeman@ym.edu.tw | |||
* '''Erich Gnaiger''' (2011-08-31): For our [[MiP2011|MiPboard meeting]]: Do you all agree on the present status of MiP''links''? [http://www.mitophysiology.org/index.php?mip-link MiPlinks] are part of the [[Mitochondrial Physiology Society|MiPs]] identity. (1) I guess, most links are generally agreed upon. But are ISOTT and BTK (BTK changed name) actually MiP''links''? Should the many Free Radical Societies be considered as potential MiP''links''? The Biochemical Society is missing, who thanks to Guy fully supported [http://www.mitophysiology.org/index.php?mip2007 MiP2007]. Where would it stop? (2) To answer one of Guy’s questions (‘It is not so clear what this entity would usefully do'): The task of general Links could be shifted to [[IMU]], taking care of such links as one of its (many) specific tasks. No single mito-initiative looks yet at networking from a modern global perspective – including the interesting initiative considered by Rodrigue (where do we find information on this new network or on the many other emerging mito-initiatives?). Is MiP''s'' different – is it really ‘international’? When organizing the next MiP''conference'', should we accept that we are mainly European, with some North and South American influence? Or should we extend our links actively to Asia with invited speakers particularly from India, Japan, China, Korea (add the countries with your personal connections). An ‘International Union’ might bring us on the right track – science without borders (see [http://www.bioblast.at/index.php/Crystals_in_Mitochondrial_Competence Crystal Conference]]). It will be great to discuss these topics at [[MiP2011]] in Bordeaux, and please help in advance to transfer the spirit of our focussed 10+5 min schedule to the MiP''board'' (not MiP''bored'') lunch meeting. | |||
[[Gnaiger E|Erich]] - [email protected] | |||
[[ | * '''Steven Hand''' (2011-08-31): The concept sounds reasonable to me – something that should be discussed in Bordeaux at our [[MiP2011|board meeting]] at least. | ||
[[Hand SC|Steve]] - shand@lsu.edu | |||
[[ | * '''Vilma Borutaite''' (2011-09-02): Networking sounds good. It would be good to discuss this more in Bordeaux. | ||
[[Borutaite V|Vilma]] - Vilmante.Borutaite@lsmuni.lt | |||
* '''Kathrin Renner-Sattler''' (2011-08-31): I included it in the [[MiP2011|Agenda]]. | * '''Kathrin Renner-Sattler''' (2011-08-31): I included it in the [[MiP2011|Agenda]]. | ||
| Line 20: | Line 28: | ||
[[Renner K|Kathi]] - [email protected] | [[Renner K|Kathi]] - [email protected] | ||
* ''' | * '''Guy Brown''' (2011-08-31): Sounds great to me. It is not so clear what this entity would usefully do. And the name ''International Union of Pure and Applied Mitochondrial Research and Medicine (IUPAM)'' is crap. But otherwise good idea: Let mitochondria rule the world! | ||
[[ | [[Brown GC|Guy]] - gcb@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk | ||
* ''' | * '''Rodrigue Rossignol''' (2011-08-31): There exists a new International group that federates a large number of associations of patients with Mitochondrial diseases, and I'm involved in it's organization: AMMi (FR), AEPMi (ES), BOKS BE), DGM (DE), MDC (GB), Mitocon (IT), UMDF (US), VKS (NL), VSN (NL). You could contact the leader of IMP, Elja van der Veer ([email protected]), to propose your idea of networking Science societies with Patient's. That's a need in my opinion to advance in the same direction. So let's discuss that topic in [[MiP2011|Bordeaux]] and we could invite Elja to [[Crystals_in_Mitochondrial_Competence|Austria]] then! | ||
[[ | [[Rossignol R|Rodrigue]] - rossig@u-bordeaux2.fr | ||
* ''' | * '''Hong Kyu Lee''' (2011-08-31): I always supported such idea. We need an international organization, just to organize the meetings and disseminate the informations and ideas. Too important topic to be ignored. | ||
[[ | [[Lee HK|Hong Kyu]] - hongkyu414@googlemail.com | ||
Revision as of 18:07, 12 September 2011
- You can enter your comments directly here, after Login.
- Alternatively, please send your comments by Email to: [email protected].
Comments on IMU
- MiPboard Meeting at MiP2011 (2011-09-07) There was little time to discuss the International Mitochondrial Union in detail. The name of the 'mitochondrial union' should be short and concise. The consensus was to persue the idea of an international union, which will be encouraged by the Mitochondrial Physiology Society.
Erich Gnaiger, Chairman, MiPsociety - [email protected]
- Yau-Huei Wei (2011-09-04) Dear Dr. Gnaiger, It's great to meet with you again in Kagoshima, Japan during the Congress last week. I enjoyed very much the scientific activities as well as the social programs of the Congress. The proposal to establish an International Union of Mitochondrial Research and Medicine (IUMRM) is a great idea. My colleagues in Taiwan will fully support this organization. You may want to make an official proposal for each of the member societies to deliberate in their own council meetings. We can have an official establishment of the IUMRM and hold the First IUMRM Congress in Kyoto in 2013.
Yau-Huei Wei - [email protected]
- Erich Gnaiger (2011-08-31): For our MiPboard meeting: Do you all agree on the present status of MiPlinks? MiPlinks are part of the MiPs identity. (1) I guess, most links are generally agreed upon. But are ISOTT and BTK (BTK changed name) actually MiPlinks? Should the many Free Radical Societies be considered as potential MiPlinks? The Biochemical Society is missing, who thanks to Guy fully supported MiP2007. Where would it stop? (2) To answer one of Guy’s questions (‘It is not so clear what this entity would usefully do'): The task of general Links could be shifted to IMU, taking care of such links as one of its (many) specific tasks. No single mito-initiative looks yet at networking from a modern global perspective – including the interesting initiative considered by Rodrigue (where do we find information on this new network or on the many other emerging mito-initiatives?). Is MiPs different – is it really ‘international’? When organizing the next MiPconference, should we accept that we are mainly European, with some North and South American influence? Or should we extend our links actively to Asia with invited speakers particularly from India, Japan, China, Korea (add the countries with your personal connections). An ‘International Union’ might bring us on the right track – science without borders (see Crystal Conference]). It will be great to discuss these topics at MiP2011 in Bordeaux, and please help in advance to transfer the spirit of our focussed 10+5 min schedule to the MiPboard (not MiPbored) lunch meeting.
- Steven Hand (2011-08-31): The concept sounds reasonable to me – something that should be discussed in Bordeaux at our board meeting at least.
- Vilma Borutaite (2011-09-02): Networking sounds good. It would be good to discuss this more in Bordeaux.
- Kathrin Renner-Sattler (2011-08-31): I included it in the Agenda.
- Guy Brown (2011-08-31): Sounds great to me. It is not so clear what this entity would usefully do. And the name International Union of Pure and Applied Mitochondrial Research and Medicine (IUPAM) is crap. But otherwise good idea: Let mitochondria rule the world!
- Rodrigue Rossignol (2011-08-31): There exists a new International group that federates a large number of associations of patients with Mitochondrial diseases, and I'm involved in it's organization: AMMi (FR), AEPMi (ES), BOKS BE), DGM (DE), MDC (GB), Mitocon (IT), UMDF (US), VKS (NL), VSN (NL). You could contact the leader of IMP, Elja van der Veer ([email protected]), to propose your idea of networking Science societies with Patient's. That's a need in my opinion to advance in the same direction. So let's discuss that topic in Bordeaux and we could invite Elja to Austria then!
- Hong Kyu Lee (2011-08-31): I always supported such idea. We need an international organization, just to organize the meetings and disseminate the informations and ideas. Too important topic to be ignored.
