Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More information

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rogers 2011 PLoS One"

From Bioblast
(Created page with " ==Comments by Erich Gnaiger== This paper describes application of a strongly advertised multi-well system (XF) for respirometry with isolated mitochondria. Where...")
Β 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Comments by [[Gnaiger E|Erich Gnaiger]]==


==Comments by [[Gnaiger E|Erich Gnaiger]]==
This paper describes application of a strongly advertised multi-well system (XF, 'Seahorse Bioscience') for respirometry with isolated mitochondria.Β  Whereas multi-well systems do provide high throughput, it must be critically assessed if this is equivalent to high output of useful data and information.Β  Based on expertise in [[high-resolution respirometry]] and [[mitochondrial physiology]], the paper by Rogers et al (2011) is discussed.
Β 
Conflicts of interest:


This paper describes application of a strongly advertised multi-well system (XF) for respirometry with isolated mitochondria. Whereas multi-well systems do provide high throughput, it must be critically assessed if this is equivalent to high output of useful data and information. Validation is obtained with conventional (low resolution)
* Rogers GW and Ferrick DA are employees of Seahorse Bioscience (at the time of publication).
* [[Gnaiger E]] is founder and director of [http://www.oroboros.at/index.php?o2k-team OROBOROS INSTRUMENTS].


===Instrumental specifications of the XF multi-well system are missing===
===Instrumental specifications of the XF multi-well system are missing===
Line 8: Line 12:
===Comparison with low-resolution instruments===
===Comparison with low-resolution instruments===


Low-resolution instruments (compare [[HRR]] with Clark-type polarographic oxygen sensors were used, and
Low-resolution instruments (compare [[HRR]]) with Clark-type polarographic oxygen sensors were used for validation of data obtained with the XF.

Revision as of 16:33, 24 September 2011

Comments by Erich Gnaiger

This paper describes application of a strongly advertised multi-well system (XF, 'Seahorse Bioscience') for respirometry with isolated mitochondria. Whereas multi-well systems do provide high throughput, it must be critically assessed if this is equivalent to high output of useful data and information. Based on expertise in high-resolution respirometry and mitochondrial physiology, the paper by Rogers et al (2011) is discussed.

Conflicts of interest:

  • Rogers GW and Ferrick DA are employees of Seahorse Bioscience (at the time of publication).
  • Gnaiger E is founder and director of OROBOROS INSTRUMENTS.

Instrumental specifications of the XF multi-well system are missing

Comparison with low-resolution instruments

Low-resolution instruments (compare HRR) with Clark-type polarographic oxygen sensors were used for validation of data obtained with the XF.